Faculty are right that AI output is mediocre. They’re wrong about why

Skip to main content Faculty are right that AI output is mediocre. They’re wrong about why If AI amplifies what you bring to it, the liberal arts mission of developing critical thinkers becomes not nostalgia but practical necessity, says Nicholas Creel Published on March 24, 2026 Last updated March 27, 2026 Nicholas B. Creel Share on bluesky Share on linkedin Share on twitter Share on facebook Share on mail 7 Source: duncan1890/Getty Images Earlier this month, a viral Substack post
Topics & Tags
Analysis & Perspectives
How AI Grades Handwritten Math (And Where It Still Struggles)
AI grades handwritten math by reading the page with specialized handwriting recognition, then evaluating each step of a solution rather than just the final answer. Here is how that pipeline works and where it still breaks down.
What AI Grading Analytics Reveal About Learning Gaps
AI grading analytics turn a pile of scores into concept-level diagnoses, showing exactly where a class or student is stuck. Here is how educators can read that data and act on it.
People Also Ask
Will AI replace teachers in the future?▾
What teaching tasks can AI already do?▾
Are any teaching jobs already being replaced by AI?▾
How should teachers prepare for an AI-integrated future?▾
Related Articles

An Ambitious Course on the Future of AI Ends with a Flourish
An Ambitious Course on the Future of AI Ends with a Flourish Stanford Graduate School of Business

Generative AI Pervades Higher Education: Here’s How Three Institutions Responded
Generative AI Pervades Higher Education: Here’s How Three Institutions Responded The Swarthmore Phoenix

How Tsinghua is shaping China's next generation of AI talent
How Tsinghua is shaping China's next generation of AI talent Business Insider